Thursday 30 April 2015

It’s your vote – use it with faith

Which way to turn? The dilemma of voting
The comedian and social activist Russell Brand has described western democracy as a “flimsy paddock…which so evidently isn’t functioning or representing anybody.” He came close to discouraging his many followers on social media and beyond from voting in the May 2015 UK elections, by calling it a “greetings card to nowhere with an X on it.” He said in an interview “Who are you voting for and for what reason? What is it about that person and their policies that are going to affect your life – this emptiness, this malaise, this disconnection, loneliness and inequality?”1 A short while later he gave Labour leader Ed Miliband a video grilling in what for the politician was a calculated gamble to turn youthful apathy into energetic action.

Brand isn’t the first, and won’t be the last, to suggest that voting is a waste of time. Even faith leaders have spoken against it. Some Moslems have said that voting is un-Islamic. And some Christians regard politics and social involvement as needless compromise with or distraction from the allegedly primary task of Christians to “preach the Gospel”. However, biblically “the Gospel” is not only about personal salvation; it is also about building the Kingdom of God and bringing God’s concerns and values for all aspects of human life into the world.

Democracy does not of course have any biblical (Old or New Testament) roots; it was the Greeks who introduced it some 400 years before Christ. But every vote does count, for two reasons. First, the society we live in is organised through the ballot box and when we are given the chance to participate in it we should; not to do so is to say we don’t care about our world. Secondly, there is no such thing as a wasted vote even if the person you vote for is not elected. The number of votes sends a signal about the relative support for people, parties and policies. It warns elected MPs that there is a significant proportion of their constituents who do not share their views; some may even be elected by a minority of the total votes cast, such is the downside of a first-past-the-post system. It may be important to remind them of that when they support measures we disagree with; letters and emails are another way of engaging democratically in the system.

Reasons to vote

1.  Apathy is the seed from which anarchy may grow. If we don’t exercise privilege, power may be misused.

2.  People (especially women) have suffered or died to give us the opportunity to have a say in the way we are governed. Their sacrifice should not be overlooked; using our vote is a way of thanking previous generations.

3.  God is concerned with communities, not just with individuals. The Old Testament story is of the development of a community of faith with its customs and laws; the New Testament sees the inauguration of a new community, the church, which is meant to be a model for all and as such an influence on the wider community: “salt and light” to preserve goodness and illuminate righteousness (Matthew 5:13-16).

4.  Jesus promoted compliant citizenship exemplified by paying taxes whether or not people agreed with the authority to raise them or the purpose for them (Matthew 17:24-27, 22:15-22).

5.  He was also unafraid to stand up to secular leaders and question their actions (Luke 13:31-33).

6.  Jesus taught that his followers are “not of the world” (that is, they have a different set of values and aims) but he also sent them into the world with a mission to change hearts and minds, attitudes and therefore actions (John 17:14-19; cf. Matthew 28:19-20).  

7. The apostle Paul likewise did not advocate withdrawal from “the world”, but rather continuing to rub shoulders with people whose lifestyles Christians might disapprove of (1 Corinthians 9-11).

8.  In his famous comments about the state which at the time was increasingly hostile to Christians, Paul recognised that secular authority has been delegated to human communities by God for the well-being of all. That such authority was misused was not a reason for withdrawing from it (Romans13:1-7).

Who to vote for

In British politics no one party can claim to be authentically Christian. Generally (and thankfully) we are spared the highly selective reasoning of some in the USA who claim that only one party can be supported by Christians and that not to do so is to compromise or deny one’s faith. (That such advocacy also may include a commitment to the right of individuals to hold firearms seems to many of us this side of the Atlantic to be a glaring blind spot for followers of a non-violent Messiah.)

In Britain, there are committed Christians in all the main parties and each one passionately believes that the party they stand for best represents the values they espouse. They disagree on where the emphasis should be placed and what practical steps should be taken to deal with important issues. Out of the public eye, they can and do enjoy Christian fellowship together in parliamentary and other Christian groups.

Because the 2015 campaign is closely run, there has been an avalanche of possibly wild promises from all sides. Tax freezes or cuts, spending on health and education – such promises appeal brazenly to our self-interest: Russell Brand’s question echoed that of millions: “What’s in it for me?” Christians have to step back from that. The two basic commandments are to love and serve God and to love and serve our neighbour. So each voter has to ask, which party is closest to my understanding of what is involved in building the Kingdom of God and which is most likely to be helpful to my “neighbour” (who, by definition in scripture, is usually someone less fortunate than myself).

The likelihood of course is that party A has some things in its favour and party B has other things in its favour. It makes the case for some form of proportional representation (such as the single transferable vote) stronger, as does the probability that we will have hung parliaments for the foreseeable future. But we don’t have that system yet, so here are some issues to be thinking about and they are not in any particular order of priority.

1.  What is the long-term vision, rather than short term quick fixes, on offer?

2.  Peace and security: the purpose of government is to enable us to live quiet lives without fear.  

3.  Wholeness and wellbeing: these have become fashionable words among the generally well-off parts of society but are relevant to all. Materialism alone doesn’t create a rounded humanity. Culture, work-life balance, living wages – these are important factors in human welfare. As of course are ready access to healthcare and a rounded education-for-life rather than just for exams.

4.  Co-operation and harmony: One of the worst aspects of current UK politics is the ceaseless personal attacks on opponents and shrill rubbishing of their policies that is reminiscent of playground barracking and teenage bitching. A willingness to give credit to others, to work together for the common good, should be an open desire, not a last resort of compromise to stay in power.

5.  Care for the less fortunate. This is fundamental to the biblical concept of human society and is a priority for Christian concern. From the charge in Deuteronomy 10:16-20 to care for the poor and refugees to the parable of the good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) there is no escaping this responsibility. The assumption that growing prosperity in one sector of society will trickle down to others simply hasn’t worked; even if it did, the trickle is so slow that people suffer while they wait. The same principle applies to overseas aid: the richer nations are their brothers’ keepers and should help both in crises and longer-term development needs.

6.  Care for the environment. God put us in this world to care for it (Genesis 2:15). Care is not the same as exploitation without thought for the actual or possible consequences for people and the future well-being of the planet. Being careful, cleaning up the mess we may make, is a creation mandate, not a side interest for a few keen conservationists.

7.  Sensitivity to people’s beliefs. Freedom of expression is rightly valued in western society. I don’t mind people questioning my faith or making jokes about it so long as they do so from knowledge rather than ignorance. But at the same time elected governments and public officials as well as entertainers need to treat people of faith with respect. Notice how Paul remained sensitive to people’s consciences and was prepared to modify his own behaviour even though he did not share their views in 1 Corinthians 8:1-13, 10:23-33.

Five-point checklist

Finally, here’s five broad Christian principles with which to gauge party promises.

1.  Justice. No party should discriminate in favour of one section of society.

2.  Righteousness. A party should be putting what is good ahead of what is popular.

3.  Truth. Do candidates really mean what they say and acre about the people they represent or are they cynically trying to seize power?

4.  Charity, in the former sense: graciously dealing with people and their needs, a genuine care for human beings everywhere.

5.  Humility. Biblically, leaders are to be servants. The concept of public service is fast fading from commercial “service industries”. May it not disappear from politics and national leadership.

Think and talk

1.  About all the above!

2.  Take the opportunity to vote, not only in local and national government elections, but also in the clubs and societies, the unions and trade associations. Become an active participant in your world.

Reference

1. The Times, 11 April 2015.

 © Derek Williams 2015

Material on any of these blogs may be reproduced for private or small group use with appropriate credit. See “Me and my blog” tab.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment